Archive for October, 2012

Playful Interview

The comment will be before all controlled and systematic one so that a valid instrument of scientific inquiry became, where occurred a careful planning of the work, determining with antecedence what and as to observe. The object of study of this comment will be the behavior of the professors and pupils ahead of the use of the playful one as pedagogical resource in the education process/learning, in the direction to verify as the professors make use of the playful one in the lessons. This comment will make possible a personal and narrow contact with the study object that provided many advantages. It was disclosed to the people who had contributed for research the intention of the same one, becoming explicit the paper of the researcher, who was a participant observer, and the intentions of this study. To the side of the comment the interview for being will be used also a basic instrument for the collection of data. It half-will be structuralized, that she will uncurl herself from a basic project, but not applied rigidly, that she allowed to make some necessary adaptations, established in a script with the great flexibility.

The focus of the interview directed to the professors will be to identify practical the pedagogical one, to analyze if the professors they are really intent to the influence that the playful one possesss in the development of the learning and if they use the playful one, making a parallel with the contents programmarians. Already in the interview with the pupils the focus was to perceive if they obtain to understand the content given with bigger easiness, being thus developed the reasoning-logical of pleasant form. The interview with the professors of the institution must transcorrer in a pleasant climate and of mutual acceptance, where information had flowed in considerable way and notable, allowing corrections, clarifications and adaptations will become that it more efficient in the attainment of the desired information, gaining life when if to initiate the dialogue between the interviewer and the interviewed one.


Electric elevators of passengers? Requirements of security for construction and installation is not being divulged for the construction professionals civil’ ‘. ‘ ‘ The constructors are unaware of its obrigatoriedades and responsibilities inside executive project of installation of elevators in edificaes’ ‘. ‘ ‘ In the academic scope of the course of civil engineering pertinent literature to the subject is not disponibilizado, leaving the proper lay pupils in this matria’ ‘. 15 1,5 DEFINITIONS For the intention of this work, the following definitions if apply: For-shock? Jamb resiliente in the end of the consisting passage of ways of retardation using fluid or springs (or another half similar). Tractive elevator? Elevator whose handles are set in motion by attrition in the grooves of the motor pulley of the machine. Scaffolding of the car or the counterbalance? Metallic structure supporting the cabin or the weights of the counterbalance, on to the ways of suspension. This scaffolding can be integrated with the closing of the cabin. Cabin? The part of the elevator that it carries passengers and objects.

Electric chain of security? The total of on electric devices of security in series. Mass of balancing? Mass that saves energy by means of balancing of all or part of the mass of the car. Load of minimum rupture of the handle? This load is the product of the square of the nominal diameter of the handle (in squared millimeters) for the nominal tractive tension of the wires (in newtons for squared millimeters) and the appropriate coefficient for the type of construction of the handle. Nominal load? Load for which the equipment was constructed. Last height? Part of the box enters the superior extreme floor served by the car of the elevator and the ceiling of the box. Counterbalance? Mass that assures the traction. House of machines? Enclosure in which the machines and the equipment related with them are installed.